On 28/07/13 20:15 -0400, Russ White wrote: > > > Please review draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02 and comment on > > whether it should be adopted by I2RS. Detailed technical conversation is > also > > most welcome. > > I was under the impression that this was being merged with > draft-white-i2rs-use-case... Did we decide to carry all these use cases > forward separately? Or not to carry draft-white-i2rs-use-case forward?
WG Chairs - is the intent to only have one BGP use cases draft? The current keyupdate draft has a large number of use cases and scenarios, mostly focused on SP network requirements. Also, I note that most of it's use cases are centralized deployment and vendor neutral specification of configuration oriented in nature. If we are going to only progress one document to cover BGP use cases, I would prefer it cover at least some use cases oriented towards manipulation of routing information to meet service differentiated routing such as those specified in your draft. At this time without knowing the authors intent (although one of the authors is on both documents?) and lack of comment on Joel's similar feedback earlier to the group, I'm can't support adoption of this draft if there is only an intent to progress one. I'd be willing to support it if the authors are committed to integrating the white draft use cases (that don't already overlap such as VPN membership) into a merged document however. Jon _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
