I believe I have now responded to all the comments on draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01. I have updated the draft and submitted it as draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-02.
Please take a look at the differences and see if your suggestions and concerns have been addressed. Thanks, Alia On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Edward Crabbe <[email protected]> wrote: > I2RSers; > > Yesterday ended the poll for wg adoption of this draft. Although there > seems to be sufficient support to warrant adoption, and there do not > seem to be any show-stoppers, I haven't seen any responses on the list > from Alia yet. > > Alia should respond to comments and update the draft > as warrranted before we finalize the process. I believe she's in the > midst of doing just that. > > cheers, > -ed > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Sriganesh Kini > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Support WG adoption. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Please review draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01 and comment on whether it > >> should be adopted by I2RS. Detailed technical conversation is also most > >> welcome. > >> > >> Authors: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to > >> draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01? Is so, has this IPR been disclosed in > >> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more > >> details). > >> > >> This WG call for adoption will complete on August 12. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Alia > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> i2rs mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > i2rs mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > > >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
