Jeff: Thanks for the suggestion on the distributed reaction to the network, and catching /IRS/I2RS/.
Could you just give me a short example of what you mean by enumerate the capabilities? Thanks, Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 6:25 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: [i2rs] Comments on draft-white-i2rs-use-case-02 A few quick comments on draft -02: In section 2 (Distributed Reaction to Network Based Attacks), there is an implicit knowledge that the router in question supports policy based routing. While an extremely common feature these days, it's not guaranteed to be there. I'd suggest that this capability needs to be reported to I2RS. The document still mentions IRS. :-) The summaries of capabilities and interactions are nice, but it'd be helpful, I think, to enumerate them. This would let common requirements be a bit more visible across the use cases. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
