On 4/15/14, 2:09 PM, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
Joe,

Besides having the same comment as Jeff, here is one more and think some 
additional clarification is needed

Actor Identifier:   This is an opaque identifier that may be known to
       the Client from a northbound controlling application.  This is
       used to trace the northbound actor driving the actions of the
       Client.  The Client may not provide this identifier to the Agent
       if there is no external actor driving the Client.  However, this
       field MUST be logged.  If the Client does not provide an actor ID,
       then the Agent MUST log an empty field.
I can see that Actor ID can be useful to report back to Client operator about 
rouge Actor. WRT logging Actor ID, when the Actor ID is not provided by Client, 
instead of logging an empty field, I would suggest to log UNKNOWN or NOT FOUND 
or NOT PROVIDED, as it is easier to search for a keyword then just empty field.

Thanks, Dean. The searchability is a good point. Of the three you propose, I think "NOT PROVIDED" is the only correct option. What do others think? Admittedly, this might evolve into some kind of enumeration where we might need values like "NOT PROVIDED" and "UNKNOWN" to accommodate different states.

Joe


Dean

On Apr 15, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Joe Marcus Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:

On 4/14/14, 8:01 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Authors,

While reviewing draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability, one big thing jumped out at
me that will require a bit more consideration: ABNF is only ASCII-friendly.
Since one of the data modeling languages we're considering is Yang, we need
to have support for unicode (UTF-8, e.g.).

I don't have a specific suggested fix at this time.  I suspect this is a
bigger issue than just ours as it impacts other consumers of ABNF.

Thanks for the feedback, Jeff!  We've been waiting for some :-).  Yes, ABNF is 
ASCII-friendly.  When we originally wrote this, we were going off of what was 
in the architecture.  I have some updates planned for this, and I will work on 
updating the model to reflect current WG status.

Any other comments or suggestions are very much welcome.

Joe

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs





_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to