On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess I knew that Brocade already uses YANG, and inferred that > what was Tom meant. >
> You stated that YANG only does config, which is incorrect. > It may be useful for people have not bothered to read either > YANG or ForCES RFCs to understand more about both. > Ok, let me take that back. NETCONF/YANG is about config. > But at a certain point it gets to be like debating programming languages. > Much of it is subjective, based on the preferences, tools, training, etc., > of the people who will be writing the code. > Or we could have requirements well stated and things vetted against requirements. I think then there is a threshold where which approach requires a bigger surgery. If both ForCES and Yang/netconf/restconf require equivalent surgeries then by all means Yang/netconf/restconf is the better candidate. cheers, jamal > > _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
