The posting from the chair was to have a discussion towards a consensus
and an eventual draft.
In the meeting people could hum to "do you like the blue shirt"; they could
raise their hands to agree with somebody's presentation. But if the chair
asks for discussion's raising your hand or humming is not as useful.
Another analogy:
If i someone said "should we go for dinner?" - then a +1 is appropriate.
If someone said "what should we have for dinner?" - then an abundance of +1 is
not useful. The former is a vote and the later is a discussion.
I believe we are supposed to have a discussion.

In any case - I am sorry i started this discussion; it is distracting.

cheers,
jamal


On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Abdussalam Baryun
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I disagree mostly and may agree if no there were no WG discussion.  IMO any
> participant can input even with humming in meeting so on lists +1 is like
> humming yes, -1 humming no (without reasons). On the other hand, we need to
> have discussions with reasons on all issues, so I prefer if we point to the
> issue that had no discussion with reason before the hummings, or open
> subject discussion within WG for clarification.
>
> AB
>
>
> On Saturday, April 19, 2014, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> No offense intended,  but can we please have something a little more
>> profound than a +1 when
>> agreeing or disagreeing?
>
>
> Was there discussion before that? The reasons may be related to discussions
> in past. What is your point? When was there voting before discussions?
>
>>
>> All i can see in my head when someone says +1 is:
>> very nice, high five
>
>
> For me is means humming YES (remotely).
>
>>
>>
>> I think a +1 should complete with "because ...."
>
>
> No always.
>
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>> jamal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> i2rs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to