On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:37:37PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Jamal,
> 
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:03:40AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > I have made another update.
> > question to chairs - if there are none of Restconf/netconf/yang
> > updates to the wiki
> > does that mean you are going to disqualify them from the process ?
> > (/me runs).
> 
> Probably not. :-)
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to fill in the wiki entry. 
> 
> I'd like to encourage the WG to spend a few moments looking over the
> information Jamal entered.  (And, if our Netconf/Yang champions would care
> to crib his text and use it as the basis for their own, that would be
> similarly helpful.)
> 
> The breakdown of Data Model Requirements is particularly a good one.
> 

I do not understand the meaning of the following:

 3) The data model MUST be able to express semantics of instances. 

I am not sure why this is a MUST:

 2) The model MUST be object oriented.
    This allows it to extensible in the form of templating and sub-classing.

In particular, if 'object oriented' means classes and sub-classes, what
does this have to do with templating? Perhaps this is backwards and the
requirement really is:

 2a) The model MUST be extensible.

 2b) The model MUST allow templating.

But even then I am not even sure what 'templating' means.

/js

PS: I may regret having sent this message. I believe requirement
    discussions like this are not helpful in making a decision since
    this just leads to an endless debate about the requirements.

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to