On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:37:37PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Jamal,
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:03:40AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > I have made another update.
> > question to chairs - if there are none of Restconf/netconf/yang
> > updates to the wiki
> > does that mean you are going to disqualify them from the process ?
> > (/me runs).
>
> Probably not. :-)
>
> Thank you for taking the time to fill in the wiki entry.
>
> I'd like to encourage the WG to spend a few moments looking over the
> information Jamal entered. (And, if our Netconf/Yang champions would care
> to crib his text and use it as the basis for their own, that would be
> similarly helpful.)
>
> The breakdown of Data Model Requirements is particularly a good one.
>
I do not understand the meaning of the following:
3) The data model MUST be able to express semantics of instances.
I am not sure why this is a MUST:
2) The model MUST be object oriented.
This allows it to extensible in the form of templating and sub-classing.
In particular, if 'object oriented' means classes and sub-classes, what
does this have to do with templating? Perhaps this is backwards and the
requirement really is:
2a) The model MUST be extensible.
2b) The model MUST allow templating.
But even then I am not even sure what 'templating' means.
/js
PS: I may regret having sent this message. I believe requirement
discussions like this are not helpful in making a decision since
this just leads to an endless debate about the requirements.
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs