Hi Alia, On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jamal,
> > [Alia] If your arguments hadn't been being listened to and > considered, the decision would have happened many months ago. Sorry, I dont mean to be ungrateful but I was referring to the last 2 months or so process where i thought the real discussion was happening. Yes, you could have dismissed ForCES right off the bat - and we have come a long way; thanks for at least providing that opportunity. > At the end of the day, despite a year of > discussion and suggestion for ForCES, others who are planning on implementing > were not persuaded nor was there a technical reason that precluded a > different choice. > Persuading people already vested in netconf/restconf/yang could only happen if the starting point was requirements from which the proposed solutions are cross-checked. Note: I recall the first time i brought it up, both yourself and Ed made it clear you were in favor of netconf/yang. I think i would have had a better chance convincing people otherwise against a requirements list. > [Alia] Given that either technology is possible, #b is a good to have > that will simplify > learning, implementation, work to be done on many models, and probably > operations. > Ok. >> On #d: >> My challenge is accepting something without seeing a gap analysis first. >> To me this overrides the economics of #c. >> So i am going to wait to see how the selections actually meet >> the requirements and how much refactoring is going to be needed for the >> protocols before i am convinced. > > [Alia] There was some discussion of gap analysis earlier to give > concepts to the WG. > I would like to see it written down cleanly with reasons in either the > wiki or a draft. > I don't think that waiting for completion on each step before any > progress is made on > the others is a good idea. It is clear from the list discussion that > there are many > interested people waiting for the WG to get on to the solutions step. > Then lets please move on. Like i said i will be curiously observing. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
