Hi Jeff, Late but still few comments on the draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-03:
1. > This I2RS architecture recognizes that the routing > system and a router’s OS provide useful mechanisms > that applications could harness to accomplish > application-level goals. What happens if multiple applications have mutually exclusive needs ? It is not really an error as applications and clients by design are independent. Where is the arbitration to take place ? In I2RS Client, in I2RS Agent or in global router's RIB ? 2. Fundamental question ... Is the I2RS protocol communication to take place in-band, out-of-band or both of the data plane ? If we are including in-band I presume there is serious risk that the information carried within the protocol may cause in-band channels to stop working hence the device becomes unreachable (at least for the I2RS system). It may be good for architecture document to be able to comment on it. 3. > Anticipated I2RS Services Is OEM hidden within the "Dynamic Data & Statistics" or is it just plain missing ? ;) Many thx, R. On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Working Group, > > The original deadline for comments on WGLC for the problem statement and > architecture drafts of May 30 has passed with no comment whatsoever. > > While we all realize that there's a bit of exhaustion going on with regard > to these drafts, they are a bit of process we simply must get done in order > to fully move forward with our agenda of putting together data models. > > We are *NOT* going to hold that work up further - it is clear that there is > consenus to start making that progress. > > To assist us with putting this work behind us, please respond to the > following questions: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement/ > Have you read the problem statement draft? > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? > (If no, please respond to the list with issues.) > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ > Have you read the architecture draft? > Do you think it is ready to be published as a RFC? > (Ditto.) > > -- Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
