Jeff: +1 on adding netmod-isis-cfg-00.txt to my reading list. +1! On the SNMP and MIB indexes. Sue
-----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 12:51 PM To: t.petch Cc: Jeffrey Haas; Russ White; 'Susan Hares'; [email protected]; 'Edward Crabbe' Subject: Re: tables was: Re: [i2rs] draft-white-i2rs-use-case-05.txt has been posted On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:29:51PM +0100, t.petch wrote: > We have just got a netmod-isis draft > draft-litkowski-netmod-isis-cfg-00.txt Thanks, I'll add it to my reading list. > and I look for items of the third type, and at first sight, I do not > see them, just as I cannot recall seeing them in SMI models, either > standards-based or proprietary (unlike the LSDB). Of course they can > be added but .... Already present, but not necessarily in the IGP MIBs: inetCidrRouteProto OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IANAipRouteProtocol MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The routing mechanism via which this route was learned. Inclusion of values for gateway routing protocols is not intended to imply that hosts should support those protocols." ::= { inetCidrRouteEntry 9 } Multiple route candidates don't show up in this sort of MIB due to the excruciating details of the abstract indices. (AKA "why we don't want to do SNMP for this stuff any more".) -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
