Sue, On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > Joel: > > You have understood my question - is section 2.8 orthogonal to the 3 options > in 2.1? The language in option 3 could imply an instance. Section 2.8 was > vague so I wanted Jeff's clarification.
With regard to the original 3 options, two of them were likely covered by the existing keywords. The one that wasn't was the original proposal for the separate datastore. This ran potentially afoul of cross-datastore references. The fourth option the netmod interim provided would appear to address that. (Again, notes coming shortly.) -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
