From: Susan Hares <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, September 26, 2014 at 11:36 PM
To: Jeff Haas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] IETF 91 meeting requested - call for agenda; status reports?


Jeff:



Please add to the agenda the following drafts: I2RS yang Data and Information 
models for ISIS, OSPF, Basic Network Policy (BNP), PBR and BGP.  PBR and BGP 
will be uploaded next week after some internal review.

HI Sue,
We are currently have drafts for the OSPF and ISIS YANG models and have 
multi-vendor design teams contributing to them. This works is being done in the 
OSPF and ISIS WG groups. You are welcome to review it but please don’t create 
confusion with alternate drafts.

Thanks,
Acee









The PBR model is the information model that is a collaboration between the PBR 
(draft-kini-i2rs-pbr-info-model-00) and the 
(draft-hares-i2rs-policy-info-model).   We hoped to have the agreement on the 
text early next week (just 1 technical discussion).   The author team has had 
meetings in August and September.



Please add the use case to the agenda.



One question – should I be submitting these I2RS configuration IM/DM as netmod 
models? If so, I will do this as well.



Sue



-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dean Bogdanovic
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Jeffrey Haas
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] IETF 91 meeting requested - call for agenda; status reports?



Jeff,



To kickstart the discussions



looking at what is needed in NETMOD and NETCONF for I2RS



datastore for I2RS (use cases for ephemeral data store)



working on ACL YANG model - with ACL model available and 
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-15 being fixed, PBR info model 
(draft-kini-i2rs-pbr-info-model-00) can be extended into data model. I'll try 
to submit the draft by the deadline (it is dependent on new 
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg, probably draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-16, being 
published)



Dean



On Sep 25, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Jeffrey Haas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



> Your chairs have been a bit over-busy recently with travel to unicast

> people doing various bits of chartered work.  This means we've been

> behind on some of our goals in terms of getting regular design

> sessions running.  I know that at least a couple calls have happened

> that I've missed that Sue Hares has done, so some progress is being made.

>

> We've requested a 1 hour time slot for IETF 91 in Honolulu to give us

> a chance to talk.  This is a call for agenda slots.

>

> This is also a call for status reports.

>

> We've had some productive discussion about requests to netmod/netconf,

> albeit ones that haven't converged yet.

>

> What have you been up to?

>

> -- Jeff & Ed

>

> _______________________________________________

> i2rs mailing list

> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs



_______________________________________________

i2rs mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to