On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:15:40AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I don't agree that multiple ephemeral datastores are needed. Support for > multiple clients within 1 datastore is needed. >
We can punt this but I believe we will be back discussing this again in a couple of years. If multiple clients inject state (in an uncoordinated way), certain things will go wrong. If we have no way to separate multipe uncoordinated I2RS clients (e.g., by controlling the priorities of different ephemeral datastores), then we will need hacks with metadata to work around this. Perhaps it is OK to ignore multiple ephemeral datastores now in order to make progress. But I believe we are better off if things are designed such that there can be multiple ephemeral datastores when they are useful, that is we should not do anything to prevent having multiple ephemeral datastores. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
