I agree Joe. The challenge with using any of the existing stores is
that if someone says "commit" they need to get the NetConf / RestConf
normal changes to that, but not the I2RS changes.
Yours,
Joel
On 11/13/14, 9:57 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
During today's meeting Dean made a comment that we could use writable
running as a way to do ephemeral state. I have a concern about this. I
know it may seem like an implementation detail, but I feel that most
vendors (and operators) assume that things in the running datastore
_could_ become persistent.
That is, if I write to the running data store, and my human user sees
these I2RS ephemeral state in the "show running-config" (or the like),
they might think those are persistent. There is no indication that they
are ephemeral. On top of that, some NMS systems that use
screen-scraping for config archive might grab this ephemeral config and
later restore state that should not be restored.
I just wanted to bring this up as I would rather see more of the panes
of glass approach rather than try to override an existing datastore for
this kind of thing. Or maybe I misunderstood Dean's comment...
Joe
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
