Joel, On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:28:04PM -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I don't recall seeing that form of commit in any protocol that has > been proposed. I think it would be rather hard to do.
One of the prior complicating details had been I2RS saying we'd use "netconf and restconf" when we selected our protocol earlier this year. As we've since seen, netconf commit and datastore semantics (protocol components) significantly complicate our needs. This has been a detail that I believe is pushing netconf off the table and moving us more firmly into restconf. This "thrashing of requirements" comes not from any mis-intention, but mostly a lack of understanding of underlying protocol components by people who are more interested or studied in protocols or modeling. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
