I am in support of this. Trace logs will be an important enabler and facilitator e.g. troubleshooting in distributed environments. Makes a lot of sense to me.
I do have one comment regarding section 7.4.1 - retrieval via syslog. Since the core of the draft really concerns definition of what contents to log, I believe it will be beneficial to leverage existing infrastructure, e.g. RFC 5424, not introduce a parallel logging infrastructure. The various fields identified in section 5.2 can be modeled and encoded as Structured Data Elements, as defined in RFC 5424, without having to define new formats. I think this possibility should be considered and the section expanded accordingly. --- Alex From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:03 PM To: [email protected] Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas' Subject: [i2rs] WG Adoption call for draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03 from 11/24 to 12/9/14 This is to begin a 2 week adoption call for draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability-03. Please include in your comments an indication of "support" or "no support." Thank you, Sue Hares and Jeff Haas
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
