> I strongly support adoption of draft-voit-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-00 > and draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push-00. > > However, I do not see anything really I2RS-specific about most of the > requirements or any of the solution. > This is useful for all types of system data modeled in YANG. > > We should only need one standard for pub/sub and push of YANG-defined data > within NETCONF-style conceptual datastores.
Thanks Andy. We authors agree with your assessment. We are hoping that domain requirements can be documented in specific WGs (like the I2RS requirements). Other WGs could also document their requirements. Driven by these domain requirements, we are hoping to progress a single technology specification in a TBD IETF WG willing to support the aggregate set of needs. Eric > > > > Sue Hares and Jeff Haas > > > > Andy _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
