The "i2nsf-problem-statement" draft describes the motivation and the problem 
space associated with service providers providing hosted security solutions to 
deliver cost-effective managed security services to enterprise customers who 
don't own or have the security functions on their premises. 

Since the i2nsf-problem-statement-01 draft, three I2NSF use case drafts, a gap 
analysis draft, and a packet-based paradigm draft have been published. 
We removed the redundant content from the problem statement draft, making it 
focus exclusively on the problem space of security functions not hosted on 
customer's premises and being distributed (driven by NFV and hosted security 
services).

In conjunction with the "i2nsf-problem-statements", there are also I2NSF 
framework draft, potential I2NSF solution draft, use case drafts (under process 
of merging), gap-analysis and data modeling draft:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-i2nsf-framework/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lopez-i2nsf-packet/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xia-i2nsf-capability-interface-im/ (new 
revision is to be uploaded soon to reflect the discussion of F2F meetings at 
IETF92 Dallas). 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pastor-i2nsf-access-usecases/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qi-i2nsf-access-network-usecase/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zarny-i2nsf-data-center-use-cases/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-gap-analysis/

I2NSF is about security functions management. The ultimate goal of I2NSF is to 
enable enterprises to utilize security functions not hosted on their own 
premise but instead hosted in service provider domain, to establish how to 
communicate desired security policies to NSF and how to get performance data or 
report out of NSF.  

Also copy to the I2NSF relevant IETF WGs: I2RS, NETMOD, NETCONF, SACM, MILE, 
PCP, DOTS, SFC, and OpAreas, in hope to get feedback and suggestions from wider 
audience. 

Thanks in advance, 

Linda Dunbar

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Mohamed Boucadair; Shaibal Chakrabarty; Linda Dunbar; Christian Jacquenet; 
Myo Zarny; Christian Jacquenet; Myo Zarny; Shaibal Chakrabarty; Linda Dunbar; 
Mohamed Boucadair
Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-03.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the IETF 
repository.

Name:           draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement
Revision:       03
Title:          Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF) Problem 
Statement
Document date:  2015-04-23
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          21
URL:            
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-03.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement/
Htmlized:       
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-03
Diff:           
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dunbar-i2nsf-problem-statement-03

Abstract:
   This document describes the motivation and the problem statement for
   Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF).

                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to