> A) I2RS has some a set of architectural requirements. These were not as > cleanly described as one might like but they were very clearly accepted by > the working group and understood to be needed for the protocol choice. > B) The working group has decided that it will use NetConf/RestConf if that > can meet the requirements. > > The corrolary is that if neither NetConf nor RestConf can meet the > requirements, then the working group will, in my opinion, have to do > something else.
Agreed. Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
