On 10/8/15 12:47, Susan Hares wrote:
I2RS WG:
I missed an important part of the WG LC. Each author of each document
should indicate whether they have any IPR on the requirements.
We have no IPR covering traceability to declare, nor do I know of any
related IPR in this area.
Joe
Sue Hares
*From:*i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 06, 2015 7:16 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc:* 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas'
*Subject:* [i2rs] WG LC for requirement documents (10/6 to 10/20/2015) -
This begins a 2 week WG LC on the following requirement documents for I2RS:
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-02.txt
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state/
Note: I2RS ephemeral state has a section on minimal NETCONF Changes.
This section is blank and this will be discussed at the 10/17/2015 interim.
We will discuss whether this section should be kept or removed.
draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-01.txt
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements/
draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-03.txt
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/
draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-03.txt
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/
Sue Hares
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs