On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:10:16AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 09:55:31AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:13:03PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> > > > > The 10/7/2015 interim discussed the ephemeral portion of the protocol
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 1)      Ephemeral state is not unique to zI2RS
> > > > >
> > > > > 2)      The ephemeral datastore is a datastore holds
> > > > >
> > > > > configuration that is intended to not survive a reboot.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Configuration as YANG config true or a subset thereof?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > config=true nodes only.
> >
> > good
> >
> > > Some way is needed to specify I2RS conformance for
> > > a given YANG module, unless every persistent config leaf
> > > is expected to also be supported as ephemeral data.
> > >
> > > If not, a YANG "ephemeral-stmt" is probably needed, since
> > > config=true is insufficient to support I2RS conformance.
> >
> > One question is whether this needs to be inline in the data model or
> > not. If conformance is the goal, then you know what having things
> > defined inline has limits. If we would address conformance in more
> > general terms, perhaps I2RS conformance falls out as a special case.
> >
> > > One ephemeral datastore.
> > > No client panes.  That was to support caching, but
> > > the architecture forbids caching, so that was taken out.
> > >
> > > One ephemeral pane that overrides the running datastore
> >
> > good
> >
> > > > Identities? I assume you mean schema nodes, do you?  Adding by
> > > > defining an YANG extension such as i2rs:ephemeral true? How does such
> > > > an i2rs:ephemeral true interplay with config true/false? What about
> > > > contexts for must/when expressions? Or is the idea to settle on
> > > > RESTCONF and to work with YANG patch?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think a real keyword is needed not an extension.
> > > Otherwise YANG groupings cannot be utilized w/ statements
> > > that are refined in the uses-stmt to set the ephemeral flag.
> >
> > I fail to understand the groupings argument.
> >
> 
> 
> The refine-stmt is defined to work on YANG statements, not external
> statements.

RFC 6020bis says in section 7.13.2.:

   o  Any node can get refined extensions, if the extension allows
      refinement.  See Section 7.19 for details.
 
> A YANG extension is (by definition) something external to the YANG language.
> The WG needs to decide if the ephemeral property should be specific to
> an I2RS YANG module or should be basic property of the YANG data modeling
> language.  YANG keywords must be supported and they do not need
> to be imported from a YANG module to be used.

Or it is a common extension (that is the extension is not I2RS
specific but instead for everything that wants to use ephemeral
datastores).

Anyway, if the main purpose is to define a conformance level, it may
be worth thinking about adding a conformance mechanism that decouples
conformance requirements from the data model definition.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to