Joe: Thank you for the message on the traceability. I'll see what Alex has to say about the Topology discussion.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Clarke Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 7:35 AM To: Susan Hares; [email protected] Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; 'Alia Atlas' Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on Requirements On 10/28/15 08:47, Susan Hares wrote: > In October we had WG LC on 4 requirements documents > > draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-02.txt > > draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-01.txt > > draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-03.txt > > draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-03.txt > > The pub-sub and traceability were WG LC in June 2015. > > All the requirements will go to the IESG at the same time > > so this check was to see if there was any inconsistency in > > the requirements. I haven't seen in from the traceability standpoint, but I may have missed something. There may be some that shake out of the protocol discussions, so we'll track those as needed. Joe _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
