>I find it odd that the current data model provides the ability to >configure encap, but not decap, for VXLAN. This would require the user >of the data model to configure VXLAN tunnel-encap using one data model >and vxlan-decap using another data model. I think this is perhaps an >indication that VXLAN encap does not belong in the RIB data model either.
I¹ll buy that argument. And I believe we can extend that argument to GRE & NVGRE as well. Anyone on the list have comments related to this? Thanks Nitin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
