Russ: Andy has mentioned the latency problem of not having back-up routes repeatedly.
My message at IETF 94 was encourage this type of thing to get the I2RS protocol and module out of the "just another configuration model". Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Russ White Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2015 9:54 AM To: 'Alia Atlas'; 'Andy Bierman' Cc: [email protected]; 'Joel M. Halpern'; 'Susan Hares' Subject: Re: [i2rs] Conversation on Priority and Panes > ideas of store-if-not-best and handling overwrites and so on. There > was a very clear push back against any such complexity. Feel free to > take a read through the archive. IMHO, then, is severely diminished to the point of being non-useful work. If there is no way to store a "backup route," then any use of I2RS to install LFAs, backup tunnels, and even temporary changes in the routing table, are out of bounds, and I2RS becomes "yet another configuration mechanism." Russ _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
