Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi there, Firstly, I support Alvaro's two significant comments, especially with regards to the outcomes of the I2RS initiated change. My reading of the draft is that the resulting architecture espouses to judge intent, or the very least the outcome of the intent, as safe. How? Apologies if I read more into this than intended, please help clarify. I only saw one nit that hadn't been noticed in other comments. Section 3: para, last sentence. "may may" Thanks _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
