Jeff and Russ: Thank you for detailed "Nits". We'll post another draft on 4/4/2016.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Haas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:08 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: [email protected]; 'Daniel Migault'; 'Joel M. Halpern'; 'Alia Atlas' Subject: Re: [i2rs] 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs - WG LC 3/17 to 4/7 On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:39:45AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > We have not received any input on the > draft-ietf-i2rs-security-environment-reqs document. The security > environments is part of the package of requirements, the WG chairs > wish to send to the IESG. > > Please take time to review this document prior to IETF, and send > comments to the list including whether it is ready for publication. I have reviewed draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-03. It addresses the comments formerly given as part of my shepherd review. (The shepherd report is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requireme nts/shepherdwriteup/) I noted in my review of -03 that there are a few spelling nits that should be addressed before a request for publication. Russ White, however, did a much more thorough review than I did and in two messages recently to the list gave some suggested edits: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/4ES9UUPEUQ4kSAnL7-riShMJee8 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/P6QZNAidn5Azye1dNAOTtxt_BuA I would suggest to the authors to do a quick update and once these edits are complete we can send the document to the IESG. The pending edits do not impact my prior shepherd report. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
