First, I would like to thank the authors, Joe, Carlos, and Gonzalo, for their work on this draft. I have done my AD review and find it a well-written and clear document. I did find a couple minor things to clean up. A new draft is welcome now. I have requested an IETF Last Call and placed this draft on the IESG telechat for May 5.
The most critical factor in getting a draft to the RFC Editor quickly is the responsiveness of the shepherd and authors in responding to reviews and deciding which comments will improve the document. Minor: 1) Sec 5..2: Transaction ID includes this note, " [NOTE: The requirements for transactions and long-running requests are being discussed in the NETCONF working group, and this text will follow the requirements set forth there.]" I think it's time to finalize these requirements. 2) Sec 6: "This is only an early proposal. These values are subject to change." Please update to an example of a potential implementation or the like,,, Thank you all, Alia
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
