Section 3.1.3 requirements 6 and 7 introduce the marking that the
protocol used by YANG / NetConf is i2RS specific. From one important
angle, this makes good sense. It avoids confusing the I2RS
communication with other NetConf or RestConf usage.
On the other hand, it seems to create a difficulty when YANG evolves
beyond YANG 1.1. Do we have to explicitly decide each time if I2RS will
support the new version, and assign a new i2rs version number? This
seems unfortunate.
Could there not be some other way to indicate that the protocol is YANG
1.1, but that the usage of the channel is I2RS?
Thank you,
Joel
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
