Hi Eric,
See in line.
Hi Benoit,
Comments in-line...
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06: Discuss
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Three DISCUSS points, which could be easily resolved IMO.
1. As mentioned on the NETMOD mailing list by Tom Petch, don't redefine the
YANG datastore term:
I see that the definition of 'datastores' has cropped up in this AD
Review, as in the e-mail below.
Meanwhile, draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-05.txt is in IETF Last
Call and redefines, or recreates, the term for us
A YANG datastore is a conceptual datastore that contains
hierarchical
data defined in YANG data models. It is what is referred in
existing
RFCs as "NETCONF datastore". However, as the same datastore is no
longer tied to NETCONF as a specific transport, the term "YANG
datastore" is deemed more appropriate.
I think that the concept of datastore has been troublesome to those
coming to YANG lately, such as openconfig and I2RS, and that this will
just muddy the waters more, especially as it is tucked away in an
Informational document. If I2RS want to define such terminology, then
it should be in the I2RS Architecture or some such; but IMHO they
should
not be defining YANG datastores at all.
The new updated v07 includes a reference to the RFC6241 definition of datastore.
Thanks. Minor editorial point.
A datastore is defined in [RFC6241] and is not redefined here.
The second part of the sentence is unnecessary IMO.
3. In the security considerations section
Versioning MUST be supported.
Versioning of what? Yang push protocol, subscription, transport session, state
of
of subscription, something else?
Updated.
You have not addressed my point
Your new sentence is:
Versioning MUST be supported so that the capabilities and behaviors
expected of specific technology implementations can be exposed.
Versioning of what? Yang push protocol, subscription, transport session,
state of of subscription, something else?
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
