Oh, I see. The story line, however, is that <get> assumes it is possible to merge operational state with <running> configuration datastore content and this ultimately lead to the /foo and /foo-state data model design pattern, which a number of people find cumbersome. So the idea is to deprecate operations like <get> that assume datastores can be merged because the models have been design to use different branches. We then need a new operation that can be used to retrieve state data and likely (perhaps as a feature) operations that can retrieve data from multiple datastores (without assuming the underlying data models avoid overlapping branches). Perhaps calling the former <get-state> is misleading people, I can see that.
/js On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:41:02AM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > The deprecation of <get> and the addition of <get-state> lead me to conclude > that you were moving to a paradigm of different RPCs for different data > stores, rather than a paradigm of a datastore parameter for the RPC. > > I may well have over-generalized from what I read. > Yours, > Joel > > On 6/1/16 2:34 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:27:17PM -0400, Joel Halpern Direct wrote: > > > > > > I think this may be following the paradigm in Juergen's draft, where > > > accessing data <get...> and <set...> in different data stores uses > > > different > > > RPCs? Is that your intent? > > > > > > > Joel, > > > > which part of my I-D made you believe this is the case? Several core > > NETCONF RPCs do take a datastore as an argument and this is just fine. > > > > /js > > > > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
