Juergen:
<author hat on> Just to clarify your statement, you are giving up on your review regarding the ephemeral state document, and you do not have any additional input. Your past comments can be summarized as; . Please define ephemeral state, ephemeral configuration state, and ephemeral operational state. . Please state as requirements only things which are changes to Yang, NETCONF, or RESTCONF. I do not believe I had any other actionable suggestions for this document. If there are more, please let me know. Thank you for your questions and active participation. Sue -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:57 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: 'Jeffrey Haas'; [email protected]; 'Joel M. Halpern' Subject: Re: [i2rs] Ephemeral State Requirements discussion On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:29:43AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > > In your discussions, I have not heard any suggestions regarding new > text for the ephemeral state document. Did you have any specific suggestions? > No, I think I am giving up. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 < <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
