Sue, Both those drafts are about YANG data models of Forwarding Rules based on "L1/L2/L3/L4 header Matching Conditions". Why have two different YANG data models?
p.s. pkt-eca-data-model even have L1 matching, which doesn't makes sense to me. L1 is the transmission bit streams, terminated by the physical layer. Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:12 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"? Linda: The English text may be similar, but the yang data modules are different in the drafts. Since filters are still under consideration, I wanted to handle draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model separately from the FB-RIB. The drafts can be merged or left separate. Is there a reason to merge these drafts? Sue From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 7:21 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [i2rs] relationship between "draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt" and "draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00"? Sue, qin and Russ, It seems to me that there are a lot of overlap between the following two drafts: - draft-ietf-i2rs-pkt-eca-data-model-00.txt - draft-ietf-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model-00 they are all on forwarding packets based on matching criteria of various packet headers (L2/L3/L4). Why need two separate IDs? Can we merge them? Just curious. Linda
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
