"Susan Hares" <[email protected]> wrote: > 4) Ephemeral-REQ-08: (page 6): > Similar to Juergen's comments, I'm concerned about the > writable/non-writable requirement. > > Ephemeral-REQ-08: Yang MUST have a way to indicate in a data model > that schema nodes have the following properties: ephemeral, writable/ > not-writable, and status/configuration. > > I'm somewhat adverse to writable operational state, and hence I would > prefer if this requirement was watered down to something like: > > Ephemeral-REQ-08: In addition to config true/false, there MUST be a > way to indicate that YANG schema nodes represent ephemeral state. > It is desirable to allow for, and have to way to indicate, config > false YANG schema nodes that are writable operational state. > > Sue: You are Juergen are concerned about writeable/non-writeable. > Martin is concerned about status/configuration.
Sue, I think you missed my point. I'm concerned about what happens when you can specify all these parameters independently. I think Rob's proposed text is an improvement. /martin _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
