On 07/12/2016 06:29 PM, Alexander Clemm (alex) wrote: > Per Robert's point, if for some reason you have multiple traits and want to > "compose" a network to encompass multiple types, this is straightforward to > do with the current pattern, not so straightforward with identities.
There is also an issue of consistency within the models. While it may not be obvious to have more 'topology types', it certainly makes sense for nodes within a topology -- for example in ODL we tag topology nodes with capabilities based on the southbound protocol (like PCEP, OpenFlow, NETCONF). Bye, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
