On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:07:47AM -0400, Joe Clarke wrote: > > Can we not treat "local config" (e.g., CLI changes) as an I2RS client with > its own I2RS priority? If all players (I2RS and local config) play with the > same priority concept, then one can easily control what gets precedence. >
I think NETCONF implementations often link the CLI to the <running> datastore (as long as we are talking about "local eventually persistent config"). /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
