That text works for me.
Thanks,
Joel
On 7/20/16 8:52 AM, Joe Clarke wrote:
On 7/20/16 07:59, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
The text I comment to says "individual ephemeral configuration
changes" - I was not able to infer from this that it was supposed to
imply "individual I2RS clients".
I agree with both you and Joel. "Individual" should apply to clients,
but we need to have something that ties priority to local config.
What about:
Req-07: Local configuration MUST have a priority that is comparable with
individual I2RS client priorities for making changes. This priority
will determine whether local configuration changes or individual
ephemeral configuration changes take precedence as described in RFC7921.
The I2RS protocol MUST support his mechanism.
Joe
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
