Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much for your re-write of this draft. It reads much better and as such, should be a more helpful document for the WG. The requirements are more clearly listed and the new section breaks with explanations are also a positive improvement. I do appreciate the new language in section 3.2. I still don't agree with the model, but I wouldn't block on the scope and method with the way this is currently written. I favor marking when data is confidential, but you've been careful in how you have scoped this requirement. _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
