The IESG Review of the I2rs protocol security requirements (draft-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements) version 6 to 10 had several comments. In resolving these comments, the text of draft-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements has changed, but not the technical requirements. This WG LC is to review the text of draft-ietf-i2rs-protocol-security-requirements-11.txt to determine the text still aligns with the WG LCs intent for the protocol security requirements.
You can see the IESG review comments at: Transport AD: Mirja Kühlewind's https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03867.html ART AD: Alissa Cooper https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03868.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03884.html ART AD: Ben Campbell https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03873.html https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03887.html Security AD: Kathleen Moriarty https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03874.html Security AD: Stephen Farrell: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03956.html Routing AD: Alvaro Retana https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs/current/msg03883.html Benoit Claise was on vacation, so his review awaited version-11. Please comment if this document aligns the WGs intent for I2RS protocol security. If no one objects, version-11 will return to the IESG for publication. Sue Hares and Russ White
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
