Not aware of any IPR in relation to this document. Best regards, Amit
From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mach Chen Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 11:48 AM To: Susan Hares <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: 'Russ White' <[email protected]>; 'Alia Atlas' <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model - 3rd WG LC (12/7 to 12/21) Hi Sue, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Best regards, Mach From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 9:13 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: 'Russ White' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 'Alia Atlas' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [i2rs] WG LC for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model - 3rd WG LC (12/7 to 12/21) This is the 3rd WG Last call for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model. You can find the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model/ In the previous 2 WG LCs, the WG did not change anything with the base model - except those things that impact on the network management datastore architecture (NMDA) or the security considerations. In this WG LC discussion, please consider these questions? 1. Is this document ready for publication? 2. Do you see any technical problems with the document as part of NMDA architecture where the model can be in ephemeral datastore or a configuration datastore. 1. Do you have any concerns about the security considerations section? The Authors should again respond to this email indicating if they know of any IPR with this draft. Susan Hares Co-chair and shepherd.
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
