Ignas: Thank you for your comments. I will check that these are addressed in the next version.
Cheerily, Susan Hares -----Original Message----- From: Ignas Bagdonas [mailto:ibagd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 8:01 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com; i2rs@ietf.org Subject: Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT) Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few nits: Terminology: rib family vs address family. Address family term is more widely used in the industry. VPLS is a subset of L2VPN. ROUTER_ID usage is orthogonal to router virtualization. MUST restriction for the domain is factually incorrect - it is typically per source protocol, not per domain. _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
