Nitin: 

On #1) -  These drafts will work through the process at the same time.
There will be a "MISREF" - but it should be cleared.   

Originally we were concerned about this fact because we wanted to send the
I2RS Info model earlier.  However, due to the network management datastore
model work in netmod/netconf - this work has been held up. 

Please put the reference in and spin it as -16.txt. 

Thanks!

Sue Hares 


-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nitin Bahadur
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 2:09 AM
To: Alvaro Retana; The IESG
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Susan Hares;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro,

   Thanks for the review. Please see NB> below    

    (1) Even if just Informative, it would be nice to have a reference to
    draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model.

NB> I'm not sure how referencing works. If I understand correctly,
rib-info-model then can't be published until data-model is published...and
then there is circular referencing.
    
    (2) I think that the use of some Normative Language is not as expected.
    
    (2.1) For example, in S2.1 (RIB definition): "There MAY be many routing
    instances and each routing instance MAY contain RIBs."  In both cases
"MAY"
    seems to be a statement of fact, and not a normative statement to
indicate that
    a routing instance can optionally include RIBs.  

NB> Rewording to " A network device MAY contain routing instances and each
routing instance MAY contain RIBs."

Note that S2.2 (Routing
    instance) identifies a rib-list as a mandatory component of a routing
instance,
    and there's no clear indication that the list may be empty.
    
NB> Good point. I'll fix that.

    (2.2) S2.1: "A routing instance MAY even have two or more RIBs of the
same rib
    family (e.g., IPv6)."  This use of "MAY" also seems to be stating a
fact.
  
NB> Yes it is a fact. So removed use of "MAY".
  
    (2.3) "MAY be optionally", "MAY contain the following optional fields"
are
    redundant phrases as MAY already means optional.
    
 NB> Good point. Fixed.

Thanks
Nitin   
   


_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to