Juergen: This is the answer I expected, but I needed to ask.
Thank you, Susan Hares -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 12:03 PM To: Susan Hares Cc: 'Reshad Rahman (rrahman)'; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Benjamin Kaduk' Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:47:45AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > > 1) Is this the normal assumption for yang models? This is a question for IEEE bridge experts, not yang doctors. > 2) If not, what is the normal assumption on system mac addresses? This is a question for IEEE bridge experts, not yang doctors. > 3) Am I correct that switches with more than 1 system MAC will augment their basic yang model with the second system MAC Address? > It depends on the implementor. If you have more than one address, than you likely add a *list of addresses instead of a second and then a third and so fourth. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
