Tom, On 9/26/2020 7:06 AM, tom petch wrote:
I have read and re-read RFC8345 and as I have said, I find it clear that a presence container must be defined but do not see the guidance as to what goes under what, apart from OSPF and layer 3.
As other messages makes clear, there's a lot of history here. The assumption has always been that technologies controlled using TE mechanisms/models of the IETF (including those worked on in CCAMP) would be based on the generic TE models developed in TEAS. I think the documents developed in CCAMP make this hierarchy clear -- but perhaps I've been too close to those discussions. FWIW https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8795#section-6 is pretty clear on this. I suggest moving this discussion back to CCAMP or TEAS for follow up focused on the ccamp document or teas-produced RFC...
Lou _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
