By: Zeinb Abd AL-Aziz(PHD)

A professor in French Civilization

The  Burnt codices and the deified Jesus

Bushby Tony 's study of the Holy Bible of Sinai codices, known to be the
oldest genuine version of the Holy Bible( dates back to the fourth
century), has demonstrated (148.000) contradictories to the present
versions of the Holy Book. This mirror how far went the crush of changes
and replacements that the Holy Book has suffered from.

No one could be sure, he says, how these texts were like because of
being so much tampered with works of the human hand, what lay credence
to this fact is that the Roman church , in 1415, had burnt down two
important Hebrew books that dates back to the second century, these book
are strongly believed to have clear references to the true name of
Jesus.

Also, Benedict X111 has burnt a Latin study entitled" Jesus Mar" and,
shortly afterwards, he also ordained that all the versions of" Elexai
chapter" to be burnt. This had so many details about Jesus' life.

Later pope Alexander VI ordered that all the versions of Talmud were to
be burnt and appointed Toma Torlmada(1420-1498) for that task, who, in
his turn, burnt 6000 versions.

In 1554, Slmon Romano burnt thousands of Hebrew codices.

In 1559, all the Hebrew codices were confiscated in Brag , this included
burning hundreds of Hebrew codices which helped in the loss of codices
that contradict or rather debunked the acts of the then church.

Bushby Tony continues to say that the oldest codices found long prior to
Komeran codices was that which was known by the name (Bodleian) which
dates back to (1100) and that, in its indefatigable attempts,
lnquisition burnt 1200  copies of Talmud.

The author says that in 1607, under a decree issued by King James, 47
persons, others say 54, dedicated themselves to translating the Holy
Bible into English for two years and nine months. Some translation rules
were strictly followed. In 1609, on finishing the translation, it was
presented to the king who gave it to sir Francais Becon to revise for
one year before printing.

He also says that many people think that King James version is the
original source of the Holy Book and all the other versions that
followed it are nothing but mere amendments that critics invented. The
truth is different as the Greek version that was translated hadn't been
penned until the mid of the fourth century. This, too, was translated
and a filtered version from heaps of Aramaic and Hebrew versions and,
deplorably enough, these were , too, burnt. King James version was
translated from five foreign languages sources, which was copied from
the original source that we don't know.

In the beginning of the thirteen century, policy lay its heavy hand on
the Christian sources that remained disputable among the conflicting
Christian sects; Albyous Tyodoria (225) says in this regard that more
than 200 different versions were used at that time.

When Constantine annexed the eastern lands to his empire, he sent his
religion counselor ( Aospyous) to Alexandria with letters to the major
priests calling them to lay to rest all the indifferences concerning the
Christian doctrine but he failed. This shows to what extent the debates
and indifferences went at that time. This made the emperor call all
these priests to convene and to bring with them all the different
versions of the bible that they used in preaching and this was the first
synod held in (325) in Nicaea to settle the prevailing debates
concerning deifying Jesus.

In June 21st,325,more than 2084 priests convened in Nicaea to settle the
debates concerning the following points:

The formal features of Christianity

Who is the god that they should follow

What are the texts that they should follow and keep.

Tony Bashby says that first attempt to determine which god should be
followed dates back to (210A.D) when he was trying to choose either
Jesus or his brother Judas, the author goes further saying that
Christianity didn't agree on a certain god.

Bushby Tony shows that after long hot debates, they agreed on making the
two gods one, 161 persons supported this new dogma and 157 disagreed on.

Despite this hot opposition, a pompous festival was held and then
procedure to conflate Judas and Jesus to be one "god" was highly
celebrated. The Emperor asked Aosbyous to collect what ever is
harmonious with the new dogma and make one book out of them and to pen
50 copies.

Tony Bashby has made an index of 869 references to support his words and
the scientific background.

Gerald Massey(1828-1907) is among those who made efforts to make clear
this mess when collecting what is now bible from the several conflicting
sources. He also says that early men of Christianity picked many dogmas
from the countries they lived in and interpolated in what is now bible
and that to facilitate the process of unifying the different cultured
nations into one nation .

In his book" The Historical Jesus and the Mythical Christ" Gerald Massey
says that the New Testament, especially the doctrine of Trinity, is
based on a distortion of a myth in the Old Testament, The originalities
or sources of the New Testament are based on some doctrines of the
ancient Egyptian pagan religions which they clothed on Jesus. This
person(Jesus) is a synthesis formed out of many persons but these two
persons( Jesus and Judas) occupy the larger portion in his personality,
this point of view  has been adopted since the age of Enlightenment till
the twentieth centuryand, now, has become well established fact among
scientists.

In fact, the sources that formed the historical Jesus are formed out of
many different sources and lead to many( when studying his personality)
confusing approaches, yet the information that formed the dogma of
Jesus( as a god) was borrowed from the ancient pagan Egyptian religion,
these all remained inscribed on the wall of the of the pharoanic
temples, especially that one in Luxor(Egyptian city), which Amohateb(
the 17th dynasty) constructe

Messy adds that these inscriptions, which were once considered mythical
were carried into the bible and even were considered , though legendary,
a well-authenticated historical facts in the bibles at our hands, these
inscriptions, he adds, is the corner stone on which Christianity is
built now and this proves that Christianity is based on myths.

Messy emphasizes that the present Christianity is a synthesis formed out
from different pagan doctrines that were once followed in Egypt,
Palestine and Iraq. These found their way to Greece and Italy and these
were the doctrine that had been followed in these place thousands of
years prior to the existence of Jesus, so the present god" Jesus" is a
synthesis of these different gods

All the historical writings are just borrowed from the worship f the
god" sun" and the story of the Gnostic Jesus that can't be possibly a
human. The Mythical Jesus is the Horus in the story of Osiris and
Hoyrakty in the mythical story of Sat and Khmonsou and the myth of the
god" Ra" and Ayo in the worship of Autom Ra.

There a lot of parallels between Jesus' appellations in the bible and
the doctrines of the ancient Egyptian pagans religions in a way that is
so tangible and difficult to be doubted, these are:

Jesus , God's lamb; Jesus ,the fish(the Egyptian Eketese ) ; the
expected Jesus, the born Jesus from a virgin whom was  shaded with the
Holy Ghost; Jesus who was born in horse stable; Jesus who was greeted by
three Magi; Jesus who was transformed on the mountain; Jesus whose
symbol was the octagonal star in the ancient Roman tomb; the immortal
child Jesus; Jesus ,the father; Jesus the born as a son to himself, the
12-year Jesus; the 30-year old Jesus; Jesus, the baptized; Jesus who
walked on the face of water; Jesus who expels the devils; Jesus with the
two person accompanying with him on the way; Jesus and the four
fishermen and the seven fishermen; Jesus and the twelve apostles and in
some version seventy or seventy two whose names were written in the
heavens; Jesus with his bleeding veins; Jesus who was betrayed by Judas;
Jesus ,who vanquished the tomb; Jesus, the life and resurrection; Jesus
before Herodotus ;Jesus in the hell; his emergence before the woman, and
the four fishermen; Jesus who was crucified on April 14th according to
the recurrent bibles and in some version 15th according to the Bible of
Peter;Jesus the ruler of the dead; Jesus who was crucified in Egypt
according to some versions; Jesus who was holding the sheep in one hand
and the goat in the other hand

Who defaced the inscriptions on the ancient Walls of the temples?

In order to silence the truth that rocks used to speak about
vociferously is that the early Christians defaced the inscriptions on
the walls of the temples by covering them with mortars and paints lest
people should compare between them and their holy bible, yet; these
inscriptions and pictures remained vivid as they had used to be
especially when the mortars fell down. These walls were repainted again
in collaboration with the Romanian authority and remained for about 800
centuries as such till the whole story was debunked and the worst
chapter of the human history was closed.

Another telltale that Messy dependd on is the death vault in which the
early Christians used to hide themselves for fear of persecution, the
worship there never reflected Jesus, the Crucified. Symbolism and
symbolic drawings that the Gnostics used remained with all its
implications among the Romans, the Greek and the Persians.

He also adds the dogma of the early Jesus, the savior is a historical
whopper (gross untruth) and that the bibles do not render any account or
information that about the present Jesus as a historical fact- it is a
distortion based on myth.

Messy condenses his vision saying that the Christian theology imposed
its dogma putting aside knowledge and science and that European
mentality has begun to unfetter itself from the handcuffs that were more
tightened on people's minds in the Dark Ages. The Christian church, he
says, kept fighting untiring against science and that the blood of
thousands ofscientists will remain evidence to its dark policy that was
applied, depending on Peter's words, in the name of God.

Let's wonder how dare the Vatican church insist persistently to
Christianize the world and inculcate teachings that now are rejected by
its once-believers because of the absurdities, incredulities and
intricacies that reign through it.

for comment, e-mail

[email protected]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to