Wes Hamilton offers the following royalty-free article for you to publish 
online or in print.
Feel free to use this article in your newsletter, website, ezine, blog, or 
forum.
-----------
PUBLICATION GUIDELINES
- You have permission to publish this article for free providing the "About the 
Author" box is included in its entirety.
- Do not post/reprint this article in any site or publication that contains 
hate, violence, porn, warez, or supports illegal activity.
- Do not use this article in violation of the US CAN-SPAM Act. If sent by 
email, this article must be delivered to opt-in subscribers only.
- If you publish this article in a format that supports linking, please ensure 
that all URLs and email addresses are active links.
- Please send a copy of the publication, or an email indicating the URL to 
[email protected]
- Article Marketer (www.ArticleMarketer.com) has distributed this article on 
behalf of the author. Article Marketer does not own this article, please 
respect the author's copyright and publication guidelines. If you do not agree 
to these terms, please do not use this article.
-----------
Article Title: How Plumbers And Other Contractors Charge / Plumber Pricing And 
Rates
Author: Wes Hamilton
Category: Home Improvement
Word Count: 1491
Keywords: plumber,plumbing,construction,contracting,contractor,home 
improvement,remodeling,consumer awareness
Author's Email Address: [email protected]
Article Source: http://www.articlemarketer.com
------------------ ARTICLE START ------------------

Most plumbers and contractors will charge by the hour (time + material) or they 
charge by the job (flat-rate) - sometimes referred to as "straight forward 
pricing". These two charging methods have been around forever!  The question 
is, which is better though and for whom?

The two pricing methods determine who is taking that risk. When a plumber is 
charging by the hour the customer is taking the risk that the job could take 
longer or be more costly. When a "flat-rate" or contract amount has been agreed 
to in advance the plumber is taking that risk.

Time & Material PRICING method for charging is typical & normal. Historically, 
plumbing repair services are charged by the hour and new construction work is 
bid at a contract dollar amount. If the customer feels more comfortable with a 
firm price they will ask for and get a firm price - once the plumber knows 
enough detail about the job to intelligently estimate the costs. The customers 
seldom know, however, that in order for the plumber to give a firm quote he 
must feel secure that he will not be working for free and he will bid 
accordingly in the higher range of anticipated cost. This is reasonable and 
prudent in order to avoid any misunderstandings later. In most cases a skilled 
plumber working by the hour can effectively estimate the final cost and can 
convey that information to the customer upon request. So it seems that time & 
material payment basis can optionally be converted to a "flat-rate" basis at 
the customer's discretion (before the work begins). In other words, 
 any intelligent contractor, should be able to give you a "cap" on the project 
cost - or a "not to exceed" price.  

The question then is - what is fair? The fairest it can be is this - The 
consumer pays for what he gets and gets what he pays for, no more - no less. 
Consequently, the plumber gets paid for his time and his materials - again no 
more and no less. From a fairness point of view this is as good as it gets. 
Time & Material is the way to go with repair work, in my opinion, if you want a 
fair deal for both yourself and the plumber.  The only time this may not hold 
true is for a plumber (employee) that is paid commission off of the services he 
sells.  You can run into problems with this with the major nationwide chains.  
So, simply ask the operator if their technicians are paid by the hour or by 
commission.  It is your right to know.

FLAT RATE PRICING used to be called "contract price / straight forward pricing" 
Somebody needs to take a close look at where this flat-rate pricing originated. 
 The customer did not create these books.  There are mentor / advisory 
companies that sell pricing books telling the plumbing company what to charge 
for the services.  In most cases the price is off the charts.  

To the best of my knowledge, it originated some time ago, and  the concept was 
this: Increase the labor rate significantly, increase the profit margin on all 
materials sold and make a lot more money. The problem with the concept was that 
if the customer was aware that the labor rate and the material cost was 
significantly higher than normal then they would not agree to pay for it. The 
solution was to mask the higher price of both labor and material until it was 
too late to find another option. This was done by simply not having an hourly 
rate. With no hourly rate the consumer can not price shop. Now the cost of the 
job could not possibly be known until the plumber had gotten into the house, 
racked up some kind of charges such as a "show up fee", diagnostic fee" or 
"travel fee" - typically $100 to $125. Only then did the customer know the 
"flat rate" cost of the job. After the customer takes off work, waits for the 
guy to show up, and is already committed to the above minimum 
 fee, he is hit with the whopper cost. The customer is now leveraged as he now 
must either accept the contract price, pay the $100 -$125 for nothing of real 
value - or go back to the phone book and call another unknown plumber. Neither 
option is very appealing to the customer in this position - your damned if you 
do & damned if you don't.

The bottom line is this: flat rate pricing for residential service and repair 
work is intentionally designed to dramatically increasing both the customers' 
cost and the contractors profit.

Increasing profit is not a new business desire. What is new is the hiding of 
the cost from the customer until it is too late to do anything about it, and 
the total disregard for the traditional concept of truthfulness and fairness in 
customer relations.

As a business owner,I love the idea of increasing my profits and having more 
money to sock away for my retirement. I just cannot justify the method of 
getting there. The flat rate pricing method tends to alienate the customers as 
they typically feel that they have been taken advantage of (and they have in 
many cases).

As a contractor and a consumer, I see both sides of the fence.  I am feeling 
great pressure to raise the rate as my costs have increased at least 
dramatically. I am afraid however to raise my rates as my customers believe 
plumber rates are too high already (unreasonably I think, but I must consider 
them and how they feel about it). My customers do not know for example that our 
liability insurance has tripled in the last 3 years (with no increased risks I 
might add). Gas has gone up at least 65% as well. So I am vulnerable to the 
criticism I get from the flat rate marketers that I should be getting on their 
wagon as the business models they present insure my future business health, 
personal wealth etc.

Flat Rate pricing means commission paid plumbers in most cases. Most flat-rate 
service companies pay their mechanics on a percentage basis (our own survey). 
Do you really want a commissioned sales guy diagnosing the nature of the 
problem and recommending a remedy? Wouldn't you rather have a mechanic with no 
obvious conflict of interest telling you what will be required to remedy the 
problem? Who is most likely to oversell - a mechanic working by the hour or a 
salesman getting paid a commission? As a consumer myself, I prefer hourly 
mechanics as the only way they can cheat me is by taking a nap when I am not 
looking or outright lying about how long the job took to complete.
The obvious and not-so-apparent results of years of flat rate pricing

1.
The general public is paranoid about calling a plumber out of the phone book.   
(For good reason).
2.
The average cost of plumbing service to the consumer has gone up dramatically, 
way beyond the cost of inflation  - primarily due to the flat-rate. (Those of 
us on hourly have seen a dramatic drop in profits - leading to the conclusion 
that maybe these flat-rate shops are on to something)
3.
The mechanics are poorly trained, as the bulk of most training is sales 
oriented.
4.
There is little evidence that the plumber's perspective is anything other than 
profit. If they do not up sell, they will not make what they would make if paid 
an hourly wage.
5.
The pride of being a professional plumber is very lacking today. (I interview 
these guys all the time). Turn over is high within the flat-rate service shop 
due to burn-out from long hours and high stress. One guy I interviewed was 
fired from his last job for not making his $1500 a day sales quota (he claimed) 
at a flat-rate shop.
6.
Customers rarely call twice making larger ads necessary in the yellow pages
Full-page ads are common ($15,000 - $25,000 per month!) in the phone book. If 
you pay out this much to advertisers, there isn't much left for payroll.
7.
Small local shops are invisible, as they can't compete with large advertisers 
for exposure. Small neighborhood shops mean lower overhead and best pricing to 
the consumer.
8.
Liability insurance costs have skyrocketed for all due to poorly trained 
incompetent plumbers causing property damages.
9.
Employers certify many plumbers with little regard for proper training or 
knowledge of the craft. They seem to be trained primarily to sell, as far as I 
can tell in job interviews).

In Conclusion, I would say that the flat-rate plumbing shops cost the consumer 
more for most repair jobs than an hourly plumber. I believe that the hijacking 
of the service & repair plumbing trade by the unscrupulous sales & marketing 
professionals has had a great negative impact on the quality of the mechanics 
and the integrity of the trade as a whole.

Wes Hamilton is the owner of PLUMB PRO, INC a full service plumbing company in 
Alabama.  Visit our website for more Free Information and PICTURES.  Visit 
http://www.plumbpro.net/ and http://www.plumbproinc.com/
------------------ ARTICLE END ------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to