Jack Kim offers the following royalty-free article for you to publish online or 
in print.
Feel free to use this article in your newsletter, website, ezine, blog, or 
forum.
-----------
PUBLICATION GUIDELINES
- You have permission to publish this article for free providing the "About the 
Author" box is included in its entirety.
- Do not post/reprint this article in any site or publication that contains 
hate, violence, porn, warez, or supports illegal activity.
- Do not use this article in violation of the US CAN-SPAM Act. If sent by 
email, this article must be delivered to opt-in subscribers only.
- If you publish this article in a format that supports linking, please ensure 
that all URLs and email addresses are active links.
- Please send a copy of the publication, or an email indicating the URL to 
[email protected]
- DistributeYourArticles (www.DistributeYourArticles.com) has distributed this 
article on behalf of the author. DistributeYourArticles does not own this 
article, please respect the author's copyright and publication guidelines. If 
you do not agree to these terms, please do not use this article.
-----------
Article Title: What is Pre-Exhaust Training and Can It Help You? 
Author: Jack Kim
Category: Muscle Building
Word Count: 722
Keywords: pre-exhaust training, training to failure
Author's Email Address: [email protected]
Article Source: http://www.distributeyourarticles.com
------------------ ARTICLE START ------------------

I am not a big fan of pre-exhaust training but for an occasional change of 
pace, this is a really intense way to go.  The principle behind the concept is 
that the smaller muscle groups in any compound movement will give out first; 
the reason being simple in that the weaker muscle will always give out first in 
any given exercise.  It does make sense

For example, when doing bench press; it is the triceps and shoulders which will 
fail before the chest muscles.  Even after having gone to total failure on the 
bench press, in reality, your chest still has some gas in the tank left.  
Following that line of thought, it really becomes difficult to truly take a 
major muscle group to total failure.  What gives out first during chins, your 
biceps or your lats?

Back when Arthur Jones was pushing his nautilus equipment and his training 
philosophy, he argued that pre-exhaust was critical to muscle growth.  During 
the mid to late 70's, Mike Mentzer become the ambassador for this training 
concept to the general bodybuilding world.  

Mike Mentzer, and his brother Ray, essentially claimed that the popular six day 
split routines doing 4 to 5 exercises per body part with up to 30 sets were 
actually counterproductive and an idiotic way to work out.  It was quite a 
controversy at the time, culminating in the showdown between Mentzer and 
Schwarzenegger at the 1980 Mr. Olympia contest.  

Part of Schwarzenegger's return was to demonstrate the superiority of his 
methods versus Mentzer's.  After the contest, Mentzer basically went away, as 
far as competitive bodybuilding went.  He was a tad disillusioned.  

But back to Mentzer's pre-exhaust methods; Mike (let us be on first name basis) 
advocated supersetting an isolation movement with a compound movement to truly 
punish the muscle.  What he wanted to do was to create a situation where the 
smaller muscle was temporarily stronger than the major muscle.  So that instead 
of the chest muscles pushing the triceps to failure; it is the triceps pushing 
the Pecs to failure.

So he recommended that you do a set of bench flyes which pretty much isolates 
the chest muscles first.  Immediately following that set (with zero rest); Mike 
would instruct you to plunge right into a set of bench press.  Right at that 
moment, as you start your bench press; theoretically, you triceps are stronger 
than your chest muscles.  Triceps would be fresh and being the stronger muscle, 
it will not fail before the chest muscles.

That was his method, to temporarily make the smaller muscle stronger in the 
compound movement by doing an isolation exercise first for the major muscle 
group.  Other examples would be:

 - Lats:  Nautilus machine pullover (I hate this machine) followed by reverse, 
close grip pull downs

 - Quadriceps:  Leg extension followed by leg press or squat

 - Delts:  Lateral raises followed by dumbbell presses

To further push the muscle to failure, Mike would do forced repetitions 
followed by negatives.  His simple objective was to work the muscle to complete 
and total failure within that one superset.  

Yes that is right; Mike advocated one superset per body part.  His suggested 
work out time would easily be under 30 minutes.  

How good are Mike's methods?  I would not presume to pass judgment.  That said, 
I think this is probably too advanced for most of the general public looking to 
get in shape.  I think the best, and safest, method is pyramiding 4 sets from 
15 repetitions to 6 or 8 for major body parts and 3 sets of 8 to 12 repetitions 
for smaller muscle groups.

Without proper warm up and without a good understanding of your own body, a one 
superset of all out effort could lead to muscle pulls and tears.  Pyramiding 
allows you to warm up in the movement that you will eventually max out your 
efforts.  That is safe.

All weightlifting principles and methods have a place and Mike's pre-exhaust 
methods should be a part of your arsenal.  When you hit a plateau, a short 
super intense work out like Mike's can help you plow through your stall.  In 
that light, if you have been working out for a year or two; give this a try for 
a month, just to keep your body on its toes.

But do about 3 warm-up sets before you jump into the lion's den and starting 
whacking those supersets.


Jack was never athletically inclined and a skinny geek to boot.  But after 35 
plus years of exercising and dieting, Jack remains a terrible athlete, but not 
so much a geek.  Plus, he's learned a lot and shares loads of good information 
at his SmartWeightGain Blog, http://www.smartweightgain.com. 
------------------ ARTICLE END ------------------



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to