On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Walter Bender wrote: > It may be obvious, but we should explicitly state that members can > terminate their own membership unilaterally at any time. > > Regarding what constitutes a contribution, here is the language we had > been using: > > Any "significant and sustained" contributor to Sugar Labs is eligible > for membership. Although it is difficult to specify a precise > definition, a contributor generally must have contributed to a > non-trivial improvement of the Sugar project or Sugar Labs activity. > Contributions may be code, documentation, translations, maintenance of > project-wide resources, running a Sugar deployment, or other > non-trivial activities which benefit Sugar Labs. > > I'd argue that we review membership once per year--it is not a > lifetime appointment.
Let me ask a question. To what end would we limit individual membership *at all*? Is there any reason not to be as ridiculously inclusive as possible? --g _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
