Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > was wondering if there would be some value of including the notion of > projects inside SugarLabs' organizational structure. > > Teams seem to me as something not bounded in time, a way to focus energy. > > Projects would be smaller in scope, involve several teams and > milestones would be an important part of their identity. > > Comments? Should I get some sleep instead of writing absurdities?
We did this at Develer, but we were a consulting company working on definite projects for our customers, so it was a perfect fit. In our case, it's harder, but might still make sense. If we go this route, let's make sure we support projects involving multiple teams. For example, "Sugar on a Stick" would touch Development, Infrastructure, Marketing... -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
