On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Dengler wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 07:50:43PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>> On 24.11.2008, at 19:38, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: >>>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Luke Faraone wrote: >>>>> [yet-another-mailing list proposal] >>>> A big +1 here. Go, Luke, go! >>> >>> The more typical setup would be #sugar for user questions and #sugar- >>> devel as refuge for developers. >> >> +1. Keep it simple (users don't use sugar-users, they use sugar). >> >>> - Bert - >> >> Martin > > yup - #sugar for novices and #sugar-devel for the rest of us sounds good > to me too :) >
I'm still not convinced that this is a good idea *yet*. Splitting #sugar and #sugar-devel should only happen after there are too many users asking questions in #sugar. The first rule of the internet is not making a rule until there is a problem. But either way, if you start publishing that #sugar is now help, I'll start hanging out there. _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
