On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Aleksey Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:05:16AM -0800, Edward Cherlin wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Aleksey Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > just some thoughts and some practices (specific?) of Sugar packaging >> > process >> > http://sugarlabs.org/go/DeploymentTeam/jhconvert >> >> Can you add something about testing these packages and reporting bugs >> in Sugar on specific distributions? > > About Gentoo, in fact, I'll be very surprised if Gentoo is popular among sugar > end users, but I use Gentoo and furthermore it helps me test sugar in various > environments: I've built sugar (both 0.82 and 0.83), at first sight, it works > - does basic operations (no errors in logs) > > But my current focus is altlinux - its a local Russian distro. The main > purpose > of porting sugar on altlinux is the fact that it takes part in state-program > "FOSS > for schools" - there is school-specific distro. I've uploaded sugar-fructose > to > unstable altlinux's repo (the same status like on Gentoo) and work now on > Russian > localization (whole this week). After back porting to school branch I suspect > broader feedback
Sounds very good, please keep us posted of your progress (and problems!). Just to check, altlinux is based on Mandriva, right? If so, how is being coordinated the packaging between the different mandriva-like distros? Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
